![]() ![]() ![]() The pamphlet goes on to argue that all of this was secondary evidence and could easily have been falsely constructed to switch a stillborn baby with a healthy changeling. That her majesty at that time had had milk in her breasts, as shown by the shirts. That from looking at the bedlinnen handed to her from time to time she could see that her majesty had been in the same circumstances as women are apt to be.Īnd 6. That she with her servant carried away the soiled bed linnen while it was still warmĥ. That the midwife held up the afterbirthĤ. That this went on until the (so called) Prince of Wales was handed to mrs Labadieģ. That she had heard the Queen crying loudly.Ģ. ![]() "This servant to the Queen, that used to receive a yearly sum of 2500 guilder, tells us the following:ġ. But not in the "official" list of witnesses that James, "the old Pretender" published years later to prove that he had NOT been switched at birth, but in a protestant pamphlet that tried to show that he had. An Elisabet Pearse, "washer woman to the Queen" was recorded as a witness at the birth of James Francis Edward Stuart, 1688. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |